The Argument indicate that the tax incentives and other financial inducements is the best way for Beauville to reduce unemployment and stimulate the local economic. The reasoning process involves the example of Diliton which implied such policy last year. Unfortunately, the author fails to convince us such proposal is the fastest way to achieve the goals above, as discussed below.
To begin with the threshold problem, the author provide no evidence to demonstrate that the Diliton did achieve the goal that reduction of unemployment and promotion of the economic. The data -2 companies relacated in 18 months- lacks of persuasion, for the average level is not provided. Common sense informs me that the the amount of companies located in Diliton is not a good level for a city. Also, the number of the employment is 300, from which we cannot conclude that the unemployment is reduced apparently, for the total of the unemployment is unclear. Thus, the Diliton is not a good sample to illustrate that grants and favorable tax is a good way.
Even assuming that the goals are completed, the analogy from Diliton to Beauville is open to cast doubt on. Firstly, the reason that makes Diliton attain the aims has no inextracable relation with the new policy. It is possible that the Diliton had built a new highway or the attractive resourse was discovered in Diliton.In addition, though the two things occured in the same time, there is no causal relation between them. Secondly, even assuming that it is the policy that make a good sense, the same policy may not be suitable with Beauville. It is perfectly possible that the Beauville’s tax level is already low enough, the favorable would make no difference. Thus, the simply assertion that the result in Dilition woud absolutely happen in Beauville is unwarrented
Even assuming that the result will truely come out, the problem of unemployment may not be solved. No clear evidence can the auther provide to demonstrate that the employees will hire those suffering the unemployment. Common sense informs me that the possible situation is like that the fresh graduates are employed ,at the same time the unemployed men are still out of the work.
In sum, to hence reduce unemployment and stimulate the economics via favorable tax and financial grants lacks of reliability. The author should give sufficient evidence to prove that it is such method that promotes the DIliton’s economics apparently and the method is also practical in Beauville. Otherwise, the other solutions, for instance, the new airport is available, policy of courage to service companies is implied, and investment environment has improved, are put forward.